Posts Tagged ‘rebalancing’
Is it better to have invested, and lost, than never to have invested at all?
It certainly helps you achieve your investment goals if you own investments that have a chance of getting you to your destination.
Take a look at the following charts and ask yourself two questions:
- If you had bought during the major dips, would it have benefited you?
and
- How would you have done with your money in low interest instruments according to the charts below? *
It’s clear that the most conservative investments wouldn’t have served you as well since the inception of this fund. What investors would do well to remember is that GICs lock your money in until maturity while mutual funds, ETFs and stocks are more liquid, generally.
Not to mention:
- If you had bought during the dips
and
- If you had rebalanced regularly
… you’d have done better than the chart shows since you would have lowered your cost or ACB and generally bought lower and sold higher.
So …
Do you have a plan, a strategy?
What is it?
Remember a few weeks ago when the news about Europe was so bad that optimism seemed naive?
I’m paraphrasing myself from a previous post. I talked about learning to harness your fear. There are always reasons you can find for Armageddon if you look hard enough.
People want stability. At times, markets and the business cycle are anything but stable. Above, you can see that during the worst stock market correction in most of our lives, an example of a balanced, dividend-based portfolio outperforming the most conservative of investments, GICs, by four times or more.
When the doom and the gloom gets really thick, many investors feel paralyzed. But that’s exactly when great investors look for opportunity.
During the doom and gloom, markets often decide to have a good bounce.
Isn’t that counter-intuitive?
Actually, it’s pretty normal. If there were no walls of worry to climb, there’d be no bull markets. In “Wait a minute. There’s some good news re the markets?” I blogged about how investors often miss the opportunity in the end-of-the-world-as-we-know-it scenarios.
I posted some stark stats in “Why you should consider new investments now”.
Since we’re supposed to be strategic about long-term investing, let’s ask ourselves a question again:
When the market takes a substantial dip, is there more chance that it’ll rise or keep falling on average?
In “Don’t Panic”, I also talked about managing fear while investing. Learning to harness your fear is important in sports. Imagine you’re taking a penalty. It isn’t easy to stand there and score in front of 70,000 people.
Why should it be any different when you invest?
What’s the market going to do?
No one knows. There are a lot of educated guesses, research, charting, but no one knows.
Accept it.
Just as, if you decide to start a business or enter into any kind of relationship, there’s no 100 per cent satisfaction guarantee.
Business, economic news, the process of investing, continues to flow. It’s a river. There are rapids. There are waterfalls.
There may even be a couple of Niagaras out there.
But if you look at history, you’ll see that there were always those who pushed and went further. For every time you encounter end-of-the-world-scenarios, you’re going to see that someone steps up, looks at the recent correction in the market and says:
Hey, there may be some value here.
Accept the psychology of the market. But get a plan.
Is the bad news over?
Here’s what I said in that previous post:
We’ve come through a tough time. We’re not out of the woods yet, but if you’ve been sticking to a sound investing plan, you’ve taken advantage of the weakness in the market.
The bad news about being an inactive investor in 2011
If you had been sitting in cash only:
- You missed a very nice rise in the bond markets
and
- A great opportunity to reallocate investments to stocks
You might have taken advantage of a great time to buy equities at lower prices and participated in the rise of the bond markets.
Or, you might have asked the more unlucky question:
What happens if the world ends?
It might be better to ask:
What happens if I think strategically about my investments?
What happens if the world doesn’t end?
Want more information?
Click here for more about bonds and fixed income investments.
Click below for more about asset allocation and reallocation strategies:
A simple way to arrive at the right asset allocation for your portfolio
Plan like a pension fund manager when it comes to your investment portfolio
Asset allocation: Diversification is king
Click here for articles about dividends/dividend-payers.
* Example fund chosen out of large bank balanced funds with a dividend bias. Fund used purely for illustrative purposes with a time period of less than ten years since the effect of the financial crisis should have been greater during this period.
Chart source: Globeinvestor.com
A question every investor should ask: What happens if the world doesn’t end?
Learn to harness your fear
Remember a few months ago when the economic news was so bad that optimism seemed naive?
Markets the world over made solid gains in January.
Have a look at this recent article. Negative investor sentiment is occurring at the same time as the best January in the markets since 1987.
The markets often climb significant walls of worry. Sometimes, it pays to focus on bad investor sentiment and use it as a contrarian indicator.
In “Wait a minute. There’s some good news re the markets?” I blogged about how investors often miss the good news flying below the radar.
Many people have been burned by the excesses of credit mania, culminating in the market implosion of the financial crisis.
Humans in all walks of life sometimes give in to greed. Exuberance and fear are flip sides of a coin forged at the beginning of time.
I posted some stark stats in “Why you should consider new investments now”.
Why post negative stats? Because, while end-of-the-world scenarios might sell bytes of information in the short-term, they don’t do much for the average investor who’s trying to be strategic about long-term investing.
The starkness of information can be helpful.
Ask yourself a simple question:
When the market takes a substantial dip, generally, is there more chance that it’ll rise or keep falling on average?
Bad news gets the big, black ink (or bytes)
There are always going to be onslaughts of bad news. Good news rarely gets the big, black ink of the headlines until the story’s over. In between, you need to manage your fear.
You need to think strategically.
In “Don’t Panic”, I went into greater detail about managing fear while investing. Learning to harness your fear as an investor will go a long way toward helping you create an intelligent plan of action when it comes to investing and financial planning.
Again, in “The grand parade of future dividends “, I discussed how corporations were increasing dividends (good news for investors) and ended with the question:
“What happens if the world doesn’t end?”
While Canada is experiencing higher unemployment, the U.S., recently written-off as a basket case, just posted strong employment numbers.
What people keep forgetting, is that business, economic news, and the process of investing is fluid. Some get so used to bad news that they forget good news exists.
Until January, there wasn’t a big focus on the positive. But whispers of good news were there if you read between the lines (or read more than just the headlines).
Now, was it really a good idea to sit on the sidelines as an investor during all that bad news? And is the bad news over?
Well, here’s the thing:
We’ve come through a tough time. We’re not out of the woods yet, but if you’ve been sticking to a sound investing plan, you’ve taken advantage of the weakness in the market.
The bad news about being an inactive investor in 2011
If you’ve been sitting in cash only:
- You’ve missed a very nice rise in the bond markets
and
- A great opportunity to reallocate investments to stocks
Risk applies to low-paying GICs just as much as it does to equities or real estate.
In this case, low-paying GICs weren’t much of a safe haven when compared to the Altamira Income Fund, or even the broad Globe Fixed Income Peer Index.
Sitting in GICs can cost you.
So, when you consider the past year would’ve been:
- A great time to buy equities at lower prices
and
- That bond funds significantly outperformed the GIC index *
… it pays to ask this question again:
What happens if the world doesn’t end?
Click here for more about bonds and fixed income investments.
Click below for more about asset allocation and reallocation strategies:
A simple way to arrive at the right asset allocation for your portfolio
Plan like a pension fund manager when it comes to your investment portfolio
Asset allocation: Diversification is king
* Many criticize bond funds for their higher fees as compared to ETFs, but for many average investors they are the easiest way to get a diversified bond portfolio since not every investor has a trading account.
* You should also note that since bonds have significantly outperformed, they may not perform as well over the next few years. A balanced portfolio is the best way to ensure consistent outperformance while minimizing risk.
Note: Fund/funds used here are only for illustrative purposes.
Chart source: Globe Investor
Part Three — Market volatility: Why and how to make it work for you
In Part Two, I left off discussing benchmarks on investment returns.
Easy as ACB revisited
I stressed that such benchmarks only reveal how your investment would have done if you invested all of your funds at the beginning of the period. These benchmarks assume you were inactive during the time period you’re measuring, and you did zero rebalancing during 2008-2009 or other significant market corrections — exactly the periods of time when you should be (or should have been) more active.
While investors should have been rebalancing during 2009, research shows average investors freeze up during these times, or worse, sell.
The worst case scenario is that they sell heavily.
Let’s say you had a large cash position in your portfolio near the bottom in 2008-2009. New cash, profits you’d taken, whatever …
Now, let’s say you used that cash and bought equities around that time, which turned out to be the bottom or near the bottom of the correction. Your return would be considerably different. And this is why rebalancing is so important to the success of your investments, portfolio and retirement plan.
If you’d been following a sound rebalancing strategy, you would have bought during the downturn in 2008-2009 because your asset allocation would have drifted away from your plan.
Let’s use a simple illustration:
• You bought 50 shares (or units of a mutual fund ) at an average cost of $7
• Then you bought 10 shares at $5 (you were brave and when the market dropped 50 per cent in panic selling, you saw opportunity)
• You then continued to deploy your cash while the market was cheap and bought 10 shares at $6 (because of your rebalancing strategy, which you follow automatically. You bought while prices were cheap because your asset allocation had changed.)
• The market rose dramatically after this period and your asset allocation reached your target. You stopped buying.
So, your adjusted cost is:
50 @ 7= 350
10 @ 5 = 50
10 @ 6 = 60
Your total cost was $460. The price now is $7.
7 x 70 = $490
You now have profit of $30, called a capital gain.
In reality, your transactions will be more complicated, and there will be dividend payments in there somewhere. But the simplicity of this example shows us how following asset allocation strategies with your investments will help you lower your Average Cost Base (ACB).
Your equity component would have been, percentage-wise, less than it had been. Your allocation plan would have kicked in, and you would have bought the underperforming equity investments.
Even if you did this more gradually, before, during, and after the correction, it would have lowered your average cost.
One way for Joe and Josephine Average to get a leg up is to take advantage of what’s available to them. Tax-preferred or (deferred) investments and plans, and sound portfolio strategies included.
But research shows they don’t. Volatility spooks them, and sadly, this will cost the average investor over the long-term.
When I was a kid …
An older colleague I used to work with said the following, loosely paraphrased, about his lack of savings and investments in his youth: “When I was a kid, I was convinced I wouldn’t make it to forty.”
Heavy pause.
“I was wrong …”
I had asked him why he didn’t have an RRSP because I wanted to understand how he thought. He later added that he had lost a ton of money in real estate (Canadians seem to have forgotten the real estate crash that happened in 1989-1990 – Americans have had a harsh reminder).
Looking at real estate in this context reinforces my point of view on buying assets when they’re low. While it took residential real estate a long time to recover from ’89-’90, today’s real estate prices (supported by an extended period of low interest rates) prove that buying assets when they’re cheap is rewarding.
Yet nobody wanted residential real estate in ’89-’90, and many developers lost their livelihoods during that time.
Raising awareness, being startegic
Raising awareness about the investing habits of Joe and Josephine Average will help them over the long-term. They need to better educate themselves about market volatility and be more strategic in their approach to it.
While this is easier said than done, it is one of the reasons the Warren Buffetts do better than the Joe and Josephines when it comes to investing and financial planning.
Market volatility, understood properly, is your friend. Reminding yourself of this completely reframes the way you look at the market, your investments and corrections.
Maybe your friend goes a little berserk once in a while. Maybe he’s a little impatient or a little irrational at times, but he’s still your friend.
You know you can count on him when you’re down. Looking at market events this way, despite difficult times, puts you in control.
Just make sure the relationship is a long, diversified one.
Part Two — Market volatility: Why and how to make it work for you
In Part One, I discussed some differences between the 1 per cent and 99.
How do the 1 per cent differ from the 99 when it comes to market volatility? Is there something the average investor can learn?
I’m not trying to defend the 1 per cent. What I am trying to do is point out that the market is public and that market volatility leaves no one untouched. No stone unturned.
I’m not here to talk about tax inequality or to defend either side. People like Warren Buffett have done that. There have been arguments for and arguments against Buffett.
What I’d like to focus on is:
While the 1 per cent have better intelligence and more powerful networks when it comes to investing, there are strategies the 99 can use to get ahead. Strategies Warren Buffett and the 1 per cent have been using for a long time.
If you’re a long-term investor, you can own a lot of the same assets. Granted, you may not get these assets at the same transaction costs due to scale, but you can own assets that should enrich you over time.
Have the wealthiest people sold all of their assets? Doubtful.
Do they sell them after market declines?
Well, let’s look at this rationally.
- You need to find a buyer in order to sell your shares (the sheer scale of owning billions in assets means it’s harder to find a buyer when you sell)1
- Liquidating such assets might cause some significant tax implications2
- Because of professional counsel, the 1 per cent are exposed to more and better research than average investors, leading to fewer knee-jerk reactions in the face of market events
There would be barriers to the 1 per cent selling their assets.
Taxes …
You can see at least three articles above discussing whether taxes on investments and the 1 per cent are too low. There is definitely a movement afoot to examine these issues.
Let’s set the 1 per cent aside for a minute.
Remember, Joe Average gets a break on taxation for certain investments, too. So does his partner, Josephine. They may not get as big a break, but they do get a break.
They get a deduction for contributing to an RRSP. They get tax-free earnings in a TFSA. If they’re invested in dividend-paying equities outside of an RRSP or TFSA, they get tax-preferred income from those dividends.
Advice
Because the wealthy have the means to get good counsel when it comes to their investments and financial planning strategies, we can assume that those professionals counsel their clients:
- To avoid panic selling
- To rebalance regularly and systematically
- To take advantage of market volatility through rebalancing strategies
Joe and Joe and Market Volatility
Now, what about Josephine and Joe Average? Are they taking advantage of the better prices presented through market volatility?
After the 2008-2009 correction, did the average investor take advantage of some of the cheapest prices we’ve seen in a generation? Is the average investor taking advantage of cheaper prices now?
Research says no. (Like to explore this idea further? I blogged about it in “Don’t Panic”.)
People concentrate on returns over a given period of time. But such assessments assume that you invested your money all at one time at the beginning of the period. How many investors do that?
Easy as ACB
Your Adjusted Cost Base (ACB), basically, how much you paid as you bought an investment, is a much more realistic measurement of how you’re doing.
If the broad market’s down 20 per cent, and you’re ACB is showing that your investment in a broad-based mutual fund or ETF has broken even, e.g. the investment’s price is 10 and your ACB is 10, you’ve done great.
Why? Because you’ve outperformed the market over the same period.
How did you accomplish this? By using excellent rebalancing strategies.
Of course, if you’ve had a more conservative position, you have to realize that when the market turns around, the broad index may start outperforming with respect to your investment. Your rebalancing plan will help with this, and sticking to that plan will help even more.
Figuring out who you are as an investor is important.
In Part Three, I’ll continue, focusing more on long-term strategy with a simple illustration of why that focus will make you a better investor.
Notes:
1The 1 per cent tend to buy shares of companies more than they buy mutual funds. Diversification isn’t as big a deal for them. They have the means to buy enough shares and still be adequately diversified. This isn’t true of the average investor. Some market experts say you should have at least a million dollars to invest to be adequately diversified when holding stocks. Others disagree. It’s true that the fewer companies you hold, the less diversified you are, and the more risk you’re taking on. Employees that held most of their investments in Enron or Nortel found this out the hard way when the stocks collapsed3.
2Taxation is another reason why the 1 per cent sell their holdings, e.g., experts have suggested Steve Jobs’ heirs sell their shares in Apple to avoid over $800 million in tax liabilities.
3More evidence for diversification comes by way of Bill Gates example. While he has significant wealth in Microsoft shares, he holds a lot of Berkshire Hathaway in order to further diversify his holdings. Forbes claims that more than half of Gates wealth is held outside Microsoft stock.
Wait a minute. There’s some good news re the markets?
It’s all bad news, right?
Nope. Surprise, surprise. And it’s on the upside.
Pour this latest data into your glass and see if it looks half-full.
Panic and pessimism may usher in a market rise (It’s happened before. It’ll happen again.)
Contrarians love all the bad news. To them, it means we’re closer to good news as they wait for the point of maximum pessimism. But maybe we’ve already hit that point?
- Inventory levels in the U.S. are low.
- Stocks look cheap. Compare U.S. equities to U.S. bond yields. Dividends look great and promise more than bonds currently.
- In the U.S., the fall in housing prices and low financing costs have created the most affordable housing climate in decades.
When could “mean” be green?
All things revert to a mean, don’t they? Usually, when someone says it’s different this time, it’s exactly the same as last time.
- Bonds have beat the pants off stocks over the past 10 years. The last time equities were performing like this was the 1970s. Since this is true, bonds have become overvalued relative to stocks.
- It’d be an understatement to mention that investors are increasingly risk averse. Panic is prevalent — especially in the news. In the face of this: Corporations continue to show financial strength and profitability. U.S. dividend payments continue to rise paying investors to wait.
- The market went through the roof last week at an agreement to agree to agree in Europe. Looks like a ton of pent-up demand. The will for the markets to go higher is there. But investors who weren’t already in the markets had little chance to get in. Things just moved way too fast. Sitting on the sidelines may leave the average investor sitting on the sidelines.
What will be the impetus for markets to rise?
If governments stimulate again, we could see a big push in equity markets. There’s value in the markets. Stick to your plan.
Filter out the noise. Focus on the facts. Find the candles burning in the doom and gloom.
How many times have you heard someone say: I wish I’d bought shares in XYZ Corp.? Isn’t it funny that when companies are at big discounts, only the few and the brave want to go shopping?
When it comes to the markets, it’s often looked darkest before the dawn. But the facts above may be the lantern to help light your way.
Updates:
Prem Watsa of Fairfax Financial sees value in the market in the guise of RIM and doubles stake
Frank Mersch of Front Street Capital says stock market’s showing value and is cheap
Follow @JohnRondina